<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infiniband</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robotics.net/2009/07/30/infiniband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robotics.net/2009/07/30/infiniband/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Lambert</title>
		<link>http://www.robotics.net/2009/07/30/infiniband/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robotics.net/?p=186#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Well, after building a few solutions on Mellanox (the major provider of solutions for IB, and the chip manufacturer most people, if not all, use), I can say this: it&#039;s fast.  But it&#039;s also buggy, especially on some of the Sun projects (ironically, they&#039;re major supporters) we&#039;ve done.

But it does provide a really great interconnect fabric, and cost-wise, 10GE and FCoE can&#039;t hold a stick on it for &quot;real world&quot; infrastructure (you know, outside of the Fortune 1000 - those of us who actually have things like &quot;budgets&quot; and actual short &quot;timeframes&quot;).

The core issues I&#039;ve found are thus:
Convergence of networks requires a lot.  It&#039;s very difficult to architect a reliable Open Source gateway for IB systems: and when you do, doing proper network segmentation isn&#039;t really possible (it&#039;s technically &quot;possible&quot; I guess, but it would require some hardcore low-level work - we couldn&#039;t get vlan management to work reliably),  So, bridging in your ip to ib network, while pretty straight forward, leaves you without a lot of vlan extensions and therefore difficult management and security.

The commercial alternatives for this include a box from Mellanox, some stuff from Cisco, but the absolute best box I&#039;ve come across by far: http://www.xsigo.com/  Absolutely can&#039;t tell you how awesome their stuff is.  Bridge IB, FC, and 10G IP in a single box, and their management is fantastic.   It&#039;s a lot of money for a startup, but it&#039;s not a lot of money relative to the cost of doing a medium size buildout (40-60 servers @ $500 FC card and $500 for each intel e1000 (just think vmware networks) adds up).

Anyways, I&#039;ve had a lot of real-world experience with it, and I&#039;m happy we&#039;ve gone down the path.  The learning has been expensive, and I&#039;ve come across a LOT of people who are telling me (vmware guys mostly) that FCoE is going to replace it - I think that&#039;s crap.  IB has a heck of a lot of advantages, but if they can solve the network management challenges for startups, this stuff could quickly become the STANDARD for federation of middle-of-the-road startup infrastructures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, after building a few solutions on Mellanox (the major provider of solutions for IB, and the chip manufacturer most people, if not all, use), I can say this: it&#8217;s fast.  But it&#8217;s also buggy, especially on some of the Sun projects (ironically, they&#8217;re major supporters) we&#8217;ve done.</p>
<p>But it does provide a really great interconnect fabric, and cost-wise, 10GE and FCoE can&#8217;t hold a stick on it for &#8220;real world&#8221; infrastructure (you know, outside of the Fortune 1000 &#8211; those of us who actually have things like &#8220;budgets&#8221; and actual short &#8220;timeframes&#8221;).</p>
<p>The core issues I&#8217;ve found are thus:<br />
Convergence of networks requires a lot.  It&#8217;s very difficult to architect a reliable Open Source gateway for IB systems: and when you do, doing proper network segmentation isn&#8217;t really possible (it&#8217;s technically &#8220;possible&#8221; I guess, but it would require some hardcore low-level work &#8211; we couldn&#8217;t get vlan management to work reliably),  So, bridging in your ip to ib network, while pretty straight forward, leaves you without a lot of vlan extensions and therefore difficult management and security.</p>
<p>The commercial alternatives for this include a box from Mellanox, some stuff from Cisco, but the absolute best box I&#8217;ve come across by far: <a href="http://www.xsigo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xsigo.com/</a>  Absolutely can&#8217;t tell you how awesome their stuff is.  Bridge IB, FC, and 10G IP in a single box, and their management is fantastic.   It&#8217;s a lot of money for a startup, but it&#8217;s not a lot of money relative to the cost of doing a medium size buildout (40-60 servers @ $500 FC card and $500 for each intel e1000 (just think vmware networks) adds up).</p>
<p>Anyways, I&#8217;ve had a lot of real-world experience with it, and I&#8217;m happy we&#8217;ve gone down the path.  The learning has been expensive, and I&#8217;ve come across a LOT of people who are telling me (vmware guys mostly) that FCoE is going to replace it &#8211; I think that&#8217;s crap.  IB has a heck of a lot of advantages, but if they can solve the network management challenges for startups, this stuff could quickly become the STANDARD for federation of middle-of-the-road startup infrastructures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
